If we are to be subject to the severe restrictions imposed on our liberty by measures such as lockdown, social distancing mask wearing and business closures, we need to have confidence that they are firstly warranted and secondly that they work. If that evidence does not exist, we have to face the possibility that those measures are not for our benefit, but are simply to instil fear and force us into a situation that only works for the benefit of Big Business and global interests. It is not too strong to say that, if the evidence does not exist, we are facing a crime against humanity.
There is a school of thought that the pandemic is caused by something other than a virus and we do not discount that possibility, but our focus is on the official narrative, which we find disturbing. To be frank, we do not believe the official narrative as presented in the mainstream media, but before crying "Conspiacy theorists", take a look at the evidence and make up your own mind.
Here are twenty questions that form the basis of our Feedom of Information request to the authorities involved. Answers, if they exist, should be easy to produce:
- Has the SARS Cov-2 virus been isolated and purified from samples taken from an individual affected by Covid 19?
- Has any variant of the SARS Cov-2 virus been isolated and purified?
- We are aware of well over 5000 United States patents and patent applications going back at least to 2003, filed for the express purpose of controlling some aspect of the SARS corona virus. Are you aware of any patents or patent applications in this field filed in other countries, including the United Kingdom?
- Is the SARS Cov-2 virus not a laboratory made genetic modification of an existing SARS corona virus?
- Does the PCR test conclusively detect the presence of the SARS Cov-2 virus?
- Does the PCR test conclusively detect the presence of any specific variant?
- Is there a standard cycle threshold number for PCR tests in the UK? If so, what is it?
- Is there a causal relationship between the SARS Cov-2 virus and Covid 19?
- Can the SARS Cov-2 virus can be transmitted from person to person?
- Has any method of transmission been conclusively established?
- Can asymptomatic individuals transmit the SARS Cov-2 virus?
- Do lockdowns limit the spread of Covid 19?
- Does social distancing limit the spread of Covid 19?
- Does mask wearing limit the spread of Covid 19?
- Is mask wearing a danger to health?
- Does any vaccine prevent Covid 19 infection?
- Does any vaccine prevent Covid 19 transmission?
- Do any Covid 19 vaccines include mercury in any form?
- Do any Covid 19 vaccines include aluminium in any form?
- Do any Covid 19 vaccines include any form of non-biological nanoparticle?
We want to see peer reviewed studies or similarly authoritative documents.
These are all legitimate questions that those imposing the various 'protective' measures need to answer before embarking on a mass experiment on the human population. Answers should not be difficult to find and are essential to ensure the public is well informed before taking part.
The Covid19 pandemic, or we should say governments' reaction to the virus, is affecting most of the world, including Shetland. We are in process of finding the truth from experts who should know and information will be posted here as we get it. Below is part of the information we have uncovered so far.
Disclaimer: We do not claim expertise in any field. We are simply questioning ingrained presumptions that have been carefully nurtured and that may not be in our best interests. We have no vested interest, nor are we telling anyone what to do, but we do what we think is right. We do not go away.
We tend to forget that our immune system has evolved over hundreds of thousands of years. Microbes (and viruses if they exist) have been evolving over millions of years. Most of the millions of micro organisms we live with are beneficial to us and many are essential to our existence. To think that a vaccine developed in a few months by a company with a proven record of corruption can 'cure' a virus that cannot even be isolated is the very pinnacle of folly. When that vaccine neither claims to prevent infection, nor transmission, why are people clamouring to get it? Or are they? the very pressure of government propaganda indicates that there is more resistance than they expected. What has been most thoroughly washed during this time is our brains, but we are hopeful that the brainwashing has not been as effective as they might have wished.
In this fast moving situation, this article gives a rounded picture of the situation at 31 January 2021. Entitled Phantom Virus: In search of Sars-CoV-2, it brings together the current evidence and casts considerable doubt on the official narative - whether in fact the SARS Cov-2 even exists and the paucity of real information on which the lockdowns, mask wearing and social distancing are actually based.
This video should not be missed if you want to get clear of the fear and hype.
Here is an account of the Spanish Flue of 1918. Soldiers were innoculated with nose mucous and phlegm from infected patients, had them breathe and even cough straight into their face, but none of them became infected. Has anything been learned since then?.
The disease - Covid 19
Covid 19 was originally designated a High Consequence Infectious Disease (HCID). On 19 March 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic, it was downgraded "As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK"..
The virus - SARS Cov-2
Has the virus been isolated? Do we even know it exists?
We have not been able to find any actual confirmation that the SARS Cov-2 virus has been isolated and purified from a sample taken from an infected person. Neither have we been able to find any evidence that any such isolated and purified virus has been able to infect an uninfected person.
Here is a conundrum: There is much speculation about the Kent 'variant', the South African 'variant', the Brazilian 'variant' and so on. It is not claimed that these 'variants' have any different symptoms – indeed they could not have, otherwise they would be classified as different disease. So, how are they 'discovered'? The PCR test (see below) allegedly detects the specific original SARS Cov-2 virus – that's what it was designed for. It is incapable of detecting any variant. The only way to detect a variant would be to sample the whole population and genome sequence every sample. You would then know who had the disease and what variant they had. You cannot test for a variant unless you already know what it is.
There are plenty of assertions that it is passed in droplets of various sizes. The World Health Organisation should know, but all they have is bland assertions.
On the other hand, an investigation into the first breakout in Wuhan, China, found that asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 did not occur at all. A study of 10 million people finds that not only was there no asymptomatic transmission, there was no transmission of any kind. Here is an abstract of the original paper stating "No new symptomatic cases" and "There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases".
This crucial part of the puzzle seems to have been simply glossed over, in which case the whole basis for lockdowns, social distancing, mask wearing, business closures and the rest are all without foundation.
Here is a video by a New Zealand doctor explaining how PCR tests work and their limitations.
The Corman-Drosten paper, which underpins most of the advice given to governments, admits: "In the present case of 2019-nCoV, virus isolates or samples from infected patients have so far not become available to the international public health community". As a foundation for government policy this paper is soundly rebutted by top scientists, who show PCR tests to be completely worthless to show the existence of SARS Cov-2 virus. Even the inventor of the test, Kary B Mullin said that it should not be used for diagnosis.
Back to the variant question: If the test cannot identify a particular virus, are we to believe that it is possible to test for a variant? We seem to be getting into the realm of bogey men, phantoms and scare tactics.
PCR tests work by taking extremely small fragments of genetic material and amplifying them multiple times to get something measurable. 25-30 cycles are considered the maximum for any meaningful result - anything more is considered worthless. However, 40 cycles are routinely used in testing. For somebody testing positive in these circumstances the probability that result is a false positive is 97% - there is less than a 3% chance they are infected.
Masks do not stop transmission and "the primary purpose of mandatory masking is to foster fear".
Wearing mask poses serious health risks for the user
Are Face Masks Effective? Copious evidence shows they are not.
Even the World Health Orgabisation says that vaccines are not effective.
Doctors Around the World Issue Dire WARNING: DO NOT GET THE COVID VACCINE!! From Health Impact News
On 19 March 20, the UK government published the following "As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectiousdisease (HCID) in the UK". In which case one has to answer "What has all the hype and panic been about?"
Government figures confuse case numbers with positive test results. A case is capable of diagnosis - in other words the patient must be displaying symptoms. PCR tests are not capable of diagnosis and have a high rate of false positives, which result in so-called 'asymptomatic' cases - cases without symptoms. Unless a patient is displaying symptoms, they have no disease to pass on to others, but, in the face of evidence to the contrary, the idea that anyone might be the carrier of disease without even knowing is a potent fear mongering weapon.
Matt Hancock and Boris Johnson contradict themselves about the effectiveness of PCR tests.
I would not normally take any notice of reports of empty hospitals, but when there are so many, it's difficult to ignore them - especially when we are continually being shown on TV footage of hospitals being overloaded and emotional scenes of people dying. Unfortunately, when I came to assemble the video for this, the main source had been taken down - apparently Facebook and YouTube continue to censor material that does not please them. A search for 'empty hospitals UK' reveals a number of sites that have received the same treatment, but here's videos of Gloucester, Croydon and Belfast with police reaction. The police have been involved to 'discourage' such reports. Meanwhile the much-vaunted Nightingale hospitals lie empty. What is going on?
In America, according to official figures, 96% of deaths attributed to Covid19 were deaths from other causes, such as cancer, heart disease or stroke - even people in hospices, who are there because they are aon the brink of death, are included. Similarly, in the UK all deaths within 28 days of a positive (and unreliable) PCR test are counted as Covid deaths, no matter what the underlying cause is. This is fraudulent mis-use of information.
Lockdowns do not affect the spread of the disease. An international study has revealed that "While small benefits cannot be excluded, we do not find significant benefits on case growth of more restrictive NPIs" (None Pharmaceutical Interventions, ie. lockdowns,social distancing, mask wearing, etc.). From the European Journal of Clinical Investigation 5th January 2021.
It seems the message is not getting through and it is necessary to resort to threats. From the minutes of the UK government SAGE Committee 'Options for increasing adherence to social distancing measures, 22nd March 2020': "A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened" and "The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging." When you lose the argument, resort to threats. Is instilling fear among the population, for any reason, the function of government?
It would appear that, because of a virus that has not been identified, tests that do not prove its existence and no proof that it can be transmitted from person to person, we are subject to house arrest, social distancing, mandatory mask wearing, destruction of businesses and any other measure the government may choose, all of which is in contravention of the Nuremberg code, is illegal in international law and is a crime against humanity (see below).
We are not being informed of the risk of a worse reaction to Covid 19 in those who have been vaccinated. Not only are we not informed, but the risk is "obscured in clinical trial protocols". A study shows that "adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials".
The government has awarded a £1.5 million contract for "an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs)"
While we do not subscribe to unverifiable conspiracy theories, There has been information circulating that information from a World Bank site showed that Covid-19 test kits were being traded in large volumes in 2018. Although the 'fact-checking' site Snopes does its best to bebunk the information, it confirms the page as geniune, but does not explain how the term Covid-19 was being used in 2018 - before the pandemic was declared and before the term was coined by the World Health Organisation. Curious.
The mainstream media are completely uncritical of government figures. This is bad enough in itself, but if the reports of empty hospitals are true, what we see on our television screens on the news avery night is nothing more than the equivalent of an episode of Casualty - pure fictional drama intended to induce fear and panic.
Here is an example of false press reporting early in the pandemic.
If you are in any doubt about where this is all leading, just watch this video. What we are witnessing goes far beyond the shores of Shetland, but Shetland has a vital part to play. The Shetland community is small enough to work as one, but large enough to make a difference. What we do here has the potential to ripple out across the world.
If you are still in any doubt, read The Fauci-Covid-19 Dossier, which sets out in great detail the planning and execution of the pandemic for the financial benefit of a small number of people by generating fear and panic among the population. The dossier is supported by details of well over 5,000 patents or patent applications for the express purpose of controlling or modifying some aspect of SARS corona virus. Dating back to at least 2003, they give an idea of the intense scientific interest in the study and possible development of new viruses - an interest that started long before the present pandemic and evidences a well planned long-term project.
Redress for individuals and businesses
Reiner Fuellmich, as party of a world-wide group, is spearheading a class action for crimes against humanity.
There is a world-wide initiative to get redress for UK individuals and businesses.
We are simply asking questions and trying to get answers, but we are not experts. We are grateful for any errors to be pointed out and corrections will be made immediately.
Sign up for the newsletter to get updates. If you agree with what we are doing and would like to help, please feel free to join and/or donate.
Back to Presumptions page.