If we are to be subject to the severe restrictions imposed on our liberty by measures such as lockdown, social distancing and mask wearing, we need to have confidence that they are firstly warranted and secondly that they work. If that evidence does not exist, we have to face the possibility that those measures are not for our benefit, but are simply to instil fear and force us into a situation that only works for the benefit of Big Business and global interests. It is not too strong to say that, if the evidence does not exist, we are facing a crime against humanity.
The Covid19 pandemic, or we should say governments' reaction to the virus, is affecting most of the world, including Shetland. We are in process of finding the truth from experts who should know and information will be posted here as we get it. Below is part of the information we have uncovered so far.
Disclaimer: I am not an expert in any field. I am simply questioning ingrained presumptions that have been carefully nurtured and that may not be in our best interests. I have no vested interest, nor am I telling anyone what to do, but I do what I think is right. I do not go away.
We tend to forget that our immune system has evolved over hundreds of thousands of years. Microbes (and viruses if they exist) have been evolving over millions of years. Most of the millions of micro organisms we live with are beneficial to us and many are essential to our existence. To think that a vaccine developed in a few months by a company with a proven record of corruption can 'cure' a virus that cannot even be isolated is the very pinnacle of folly. What has been most thoroughly washed during this time is our brains.
This is one of the best sources I have found to give a balanced overview of the pandemic: This video should not be missed if you want to get clear of the fear and hype.
Here is an account of the Spanish Flue of 1918. The similarities with the current pandemic make one wonder if anything has been learned.
Has the virus been isolated? Do we even know it exists?
If the original virus has not been isolated, how do we know there is a variant? You need to be able to identify something before you say you have a variant of it.
There are plenty of assertions that it is passed in droplets of various sizes. The World Health Organisation should know, but all they have is bland assertions.
On the other hand, in an investigation into the first breakout in Wuhan, China, found that asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 did not occur at all. A study of 10 million people finds that not only was there no asymptomatic transmission, there was no transmission of any kind. Here is an abstract of the original paper stating "No new symptomatic cases" and "There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases".
This crucial part of the puzzle seems to have been simply glossed over, in which case the whole basis for lockdowns, social distancing, mask wearing, business closures and the rest are all without foundation.
Here is a video by a New Zealand doctor explaining how PCR tests work and their limitations.
The Corman-Drosten paper, which underpins most of the advice given to governments, states "In the present case of 2019-nCoV, virus isolates or samples from infected patients have so far not become available to the international public health community". This paper is soundly rebutted by top scientists, who show it to be completely worthless to show the existence of SARS Cov-2 virus.
Back to the variant question: If the test cannot identify a particular virus, are we to believe that it is possible to test for a variant? We seem to be getting into the realm of bogey men, phantoms and scare tactics.
PCR tests work by taking extremely small fragments of genetic material and amplifying them multiple times to get something measurable. 25-30 cycles are considered the maximum for any meaningful result - anything more is considered worthless. However, 40 cycles are routinely used in testing. For somebody testing positive in these circumstances the probability that said result is a false positive is 97% - there is less than a 3% chance they are infected.
Masks do not stop transmission and "the primary purpose of mandatory masking is to foster fear".
Wearing mask poses serious health risks for the user
Are Face Masks Effective? Copious evidence shows they are not.
Even the World Health Orgabisation says that vaccines are not effective.
Doctors Around the World Issue Dire WARNING: DO NOT GET THE COVID VACCINE!! From Health Impact News
Government figures confuse case numbers with positive test results. A case is capable of diagnosis - in other words the patient must be displaying symptoms. PCR tests are not capable of diagnosis and have a high rate of false positives, which result in so-called 'asymptomatic' cases - cases without symptoms. Unless a patient is displaying symptoms, they have no disease to pass on to others, but, in the face of evidence to the contrary, the idea that anyone might be the carrier of disease without even knowing is a potent fear mongering weapon.
Matt Hancock and Boris Johnson contradict themselves about the effectiveness of PCR tests.
I would not normally take any notice of report of empty hospitals, but when there are so many, it's difficult to ignore them - especially when we continually being shown footage of hospitals being overloaded and emotional scenes of people dying. Meanwhile the much-vaunted Nightingale hospitals lie empty. What is going on?
In America, according to official figures, 96% of deaths attributed to Covid19 were deaths from other causes, such as cancer, heart disease or stroke - even people in hospices, who are there because they are aon the brink of death, are included. Similarly, in the UK all deaths within 28 days of a positive (and unreliable) PCR test are counted as Covid deaths, no matter what the underlying cause is. This is fraudulent mis-use of information.
Lockdowns do not affect the spread of the disease. An international study has revealed that "While small benefits cannot be excluded, we do not find significant benefits on case growth of more restrictive NPIs" (None Pharmaceutical Interventions, ie. lockdowns,social distancing, mask wearing, etc.). From the European Journal of Clinical Investigation 5th January 2021.
It seems the message is not getting through and it is necessary to resort to threats. From the minutes of the UK government SAGE Committee 'Options for increasing adherence to social distancing measures, 22nd March 2020': "A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened" and "The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging." When you lose the argument, resort to threats. Is instilling fear among the population, for any reason, the function of government?
It would appear that, because of a virus that has not been identified, tests that do not prove its existence and no proof that it can be transmitted from person to person, we are subject to house arrest, social distancing, mandatory mask wearing, destruction of businesses and any other measure the government may choose, all of which is in contravention of the Nuremberg code, is illegal in international law and is a crime against humanity (see below).
We are not being informed of the risk of a worse reaction to Covid 19 in those who have been vaccinated. Not only are we not informed, but the risk is "obscured in clinical trial protocols". A study shows that "adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials".
The mainstream media are completely uncritical of government figures. This is bad enough in itself, but if the reports of empty hospitals are true, what we see on our television screens on the news avery night is nothing more than the equivalent of an episode of Casualty - pure fictional drama intended to induce fear and panic.
Here is an example of false press reporting early in the pandemic.
If you are in any doubt about where this is all leading, just watch this video. What we are witnessing goes far beyond the shores of Shetland, but Shetland has a vital part to play. The Shetland community is small enough to work as one, but large enough to make a difference. What we do here has the potential to ripple out across the world.
If you are still in any doubt, read The Fauci-Covid-19 Dossier, which sets out in great detail the planning and execution of the pandemic for the financial benefit of a small number of people by generating fear and panic among the population.
Redress for individuals and businesses
Reiner Fuellmich, as party of a world-wide group, is spearheading a class action for crimes against humanity.
There is a world-wide initiative to get redress for UK individuals and businesses.
Sign up for the newsletter to get updates. If you agree with what we are doing and would like to help, please feel free to join and/or donate.
Back to Presumptions page.